About your Search

20121121
20121129
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
the dangers of going over the fiscal cliff and what that means for our economy, that there's too much stubbornness in congress, that we can't even agree on giving middle-class families a tax cut, then middle-class families are all going to end up having a big tax hike. that's going to be a pretty rude shock for them, and i suspect will have a big impact on the holiday shopping season, which in turn will have an impact on business planning and hiring, and we can go back into a recession. >> sean: republicans hate big beared and santa claus. don't buy this hype, such as letting the bush cuts expire, are not the answer to tackling this deficit. in fact, during the 2012 fiscal year the federal government cost $9.7 billion to run each and every day, but the additional revenue from letting the bush tax cuts expire only amounts to around $82 billion a year, meaning the government would be funded for a whopping 8.5 days if in fact the president wins this fight. sadly the real reason we've reached this point is because our elected representatives simply have no idea how to stop spending your m
to improve the economy in the last congress. you don't get anywhere with -- >> sean: why are they saying ahead of time -- i don't care if you call it tax reform, or we'll go for revenues. it's still tax increases. you know, can we stop playing this washingtonian -- >> i do think there's a general consensus we have to figure out a way to get more revenue to pay for the things we promised to people. >> sean: why can't they stop spending? >> why focus on the republicans? >> sean: they're the ones showing every indication, we'll give in on spending. oh, my pledge to grover norquist doesn't mean anything more. >> i don't believe in pledges anyway. you should pledge to uphold the constitution, and we should be able to trust our elected leaders to make decisions based on facts and -- >> sean: did one republican run on raising revenue? >> no -- well, actually i don't know if that's true. >> i don't know one. >> why are we talking about the republicans when we should be talking about the conservative democrats who ran senate seats who ran on a campaign against what president obama is talking abou
? >> yeah. probably not the best thing for the economy but if you look at the workers they have valid complaints against walmart. i'm not a big fan of walmart in the way they have treated their employees. i really don't understand how the national labor relations board have a right to tell people they can't picket. you as a libertarian would be offended by that. >> i don't think governments should have anything to do with unions and vice versa? >> they have retaliation of people that have brought up issues having regular work schedules. >> how many people are being forced to work at walmart? i've had a job before and i've been fired. you don't have to work somewhere if you don't like it? >> they are allowed to protest. it's like a hospital. somebody can't buy their snuggie. >> people want to quit if they don't like it. not about walmar. this is about the labor unions trying to tap in, the democratic party trying to tap in one of the great untapped sources of wealth which is walmart employees? >> absolutely. remember. walmart has been a target of the left for so many years right now. t
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)